Can an RTX 5090 run DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct?
llm-speed has not measured DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct on RTX 5090 itself yet, so there is no llm-speed verdict. 2 community-submitted runs exist (fastest 309.5 tok/s at an unreported quant on llama.cpp); community-submitted, not measured by llm-speed, so they give no verdict.
2 signed runs on llm-speed. Single-request decode speed in tokens per second; the short-chat workload unless noted. All 2 runs are community-submitted (signed on the submitter's own machine, not measured by llm-speed, and not used for llm-speed verdicts). Verdicts and headline numbers use only llm-speed's own runs and fit tests.
Measured tok/s by quant and runtime
| Quant | Runtime | Build | Decode tok/s (best run) | Workload | Runs | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| not reported | llama.cpp | not reported | 309.5 | chat-short | 2 | Community-submitted |
llm-speed has not measured this pair itself, so there is no llm-speed verdict or fastest quant. The rows above are community-submitted, not measured by llm-speed.
VRAM: not recorded for these runs. The VRAM calculator gives an estimate (predicted, not measured).
Every measured row
| Run | Date (UTC) | Workload | Quant | Runtime / build | Prompt tokens | Output tokens | Decode tok/s | Prefill tok/s | TTFT ms | VRAM GiB | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r_0_gs1rgl2fl | 2026-07-01 | chat-short | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 0 | 256 | 309.5 | – | 268 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_bfpto9so2o1 | 2026-07-01 | chat-short | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 0 | 256 | 293.1 | – | 297 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_bfpto9so2o1 | 2026-07-01 | chat-long | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 0 | 482 | 181.2 | – | 361 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_bfpto9so2o1 | 2026-07-01 | agent-trace | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 3362 | 840 | 204.5 | 24978.7 | 81 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_bfpto9so2o1 | 2026-07-01 | concurrent-decode | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 1024 | 256 | 268.4 | – | – | – | Community-submitted |
Questions
Can an RTX 5090 run DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct?
llm-speed has not measured DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct on RTX 5090 itself yet, so there is no llm-speed verdict. 2 community-submitted runs exist (fastest 309.5 tok/s at an unreported quant on llama.cpp); community-submitted, not measured by llm-speed, so they give no verdict.
What did community runs measure for DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct on an RTX 5090?
2 community-submitted runs (community-submitted, not measured by llm-speed): not reported on llama.cpp: 309.5 tok/s. They are listed for reference and give no llm-speed verdict.
Sources and related pages
- Source runs: r_0_gs1rgl2fl, r_bfpto9so2o1
- DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct: every measured GPU and Mac
- RTX 5090: every measured model
- VRAM calculator for DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct on RTX 5090
- RTX 5090 vs RTX 4090
- RTX 5090 vs RTX 3090
- DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct vs Codestral-22B-v0.1
- DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct
- Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct
- How runs are measured · open dataset (CC BY 4.0)