Can an RTX 4090 run Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct?
llm-speed has not measured Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct on RTX 4090 itself yet, so there is no llm-speed verdict. 2 community-submitted runs exist (fastest 89.9 tok/s at Q4_K_M on llama.cpp); community-submitted, not measured by llm-speed, so they give no verdict.
2 signed runs on llm-speed. Single-request decode speed in tokens per second; the short-chat workload unless noted. All 2 runs are community-submitted (signed on the submitter's own machine, not measured by llm-speed, and not used for llm-speed verdicts). Verdicts and headline numbers use only llm-speed's own runs and fit tests.
Measured tok/s by quant and runtime
| Quant | Runtime | Build | Decode tok/s (best run) | Workload | Runs | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4_K_M | llama.cpp | commit df18bee | 89.9 | chat-short | 1 | Community-submitted |
| Q4_K_M | ollama | 0.31.1 | 81.2 | chat-short | 1 | Community-submitted |
llm-speed has not measured this pair itself, so there is no llm-speed verdict or fastest quant. The rows above are community-submitted, not measured by llm-speed.
VRAM: not recorded for these runs. The VRAM calculator gives an estimate (predicted, not measured).
Every measured row
| Run | Date (UTC) | Workload | Quant | Runtime / build | Prompt tokens | Output tokens | Decode tok/s | Prefill tok/s | TTFT ms | VRAM GiB | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r_eqnsqmgz29a | 2026-10-14 | chat-short | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp · commit df18bee | 131 | 256 | 89.9 | 2292.6 | 57 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_ttniv2j74vk | 2026-10-14 | chat-short | Q4_K_M | ollama · 0.31.1 | 131 | 256 | 81.2 | 324.4 | 404 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_eqnsqmgz29a | 2026-10-14 | chat-long | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp · commit df18bee | 3168 | 426 | 84.2 | 4989.1 | 635 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_ttniv2j74vk | 2026-10-14 | chat-long | Q4_K_M | ollama · 0.31.1 | 3168 | 603 | 76.6 | 3252.2 | 974 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_eqnsqmgz29a | 2026-10-14 | agent-trace | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp · commit df18bee | 3268 | 840 | 86.6 | 14684.0 | 142 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_ttniv2j74vk | 2026-10-14 | agent-trace | Q4_K_M | ollama · 0.31.1 | 3268 | 840 | 78.6 | 4874.6 | 449 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_eqnsqmgz29a | 2026-10-14 | concurrent-decode | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp · commit df18bee | 1024 | 256 | 88.9 | – | – | – | Community-submitted |
| r_ttniv2j74vk | 2026-10-14 | concurrent-decode | Q4_K_M | ollama · 0.31.1 | 1024 | 256 | 80.1 | – | – | – | Community-submitted |
Questions
Can an RTX 4090 run Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct?
llm-speed has not measured Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct on RTX 4090 itself yet, so there is no llm-speed verdict. 2 community-submitted runs exist (fastest 89.9 tok/s at Q4_K_M on llama.cpp); community-submitted, not measured by llm-speed, so they give no verdict.
What did community runs measure for Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct on an RTX 4090?
2 community-submitted runs (community-submitted, not measured by llm-speed): Q4_K_M on llama.cpp: 89.9 tok/s; Q4_K_M on ollama: 81.2 tok/s. They are listed for reference and give no llm-speed verdict.
Sources and related pages
- Source runs: r_eqnsqmgz29a, r_ttniv2j74vk
- Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct: every measured GPU and Mac
- RTX 4090: every measured model
- VRAM calculator for Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct on RTX 4090
- RTX 5090 vs RTX 4090
- RTX 4090 vs RTX 3090
- RTX 4090 vs M4 Max
- Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct
- How runs are measured · open dataset (CC BY 4.0)