Can an RTX 5090 run Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct?
Yes: an RTX 5090 runs Qwen2.5-Coder 14B at 137.3 tok/s at Q4_K_M, measured on llama.cpp with a 131-token prompt in October 2026.
3 signed runs on llm-speed. Single-request decode speed in tokens per second; the short-chat workload unless noted. 1 of 3 runs were measured by llm-speed (@llmspeed); the other 2 are community-submitted (signed on the submitter's own machine, not measured by llm-speed, and not used for llm-speed verdicts). Runs measured by llm-speed are credited to @llmspeed. Verdicts and headline numbers use only llm-speed's own runs and fit tests.
Measured tok/s by quant and runtime
| Quant | Runtime | Build | Decode tok/s (best run) | Workload | Runs | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4_K_M | llama.cpp | commit 1268eda | 137.3 | chat-short | 1 | Measured by llm-speed@llmspeed |
| not reported | llama.cpp | not reported | 140.0 | chat-short | 2 | Community-submitted |
Fastest quant that fits: Q4_K_M on llama.cpp, 137.3 tok/s (measured by llm-speed; it fits because it ran on this hardware). Quants without a run are not listed.
VRAM: not recorded for these runs. The VRAM calculator gives an estimate (predicted, not measured).
Every measured row
| Run | Date (UTC) | Workload | Quant | Runtime / build | Prompt tokens | Output tokens | Decode tok/s | Prefill tok/s | TTFT ms | VRAM GiB | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r_opuj21f13-_ | 2026-07-01 | chat-short | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 0 | 256 | 140.0 | – | 42 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_xnr_k4emoyr | 2026-10-17 | chat-short | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp · commit 1268eda | 131 | 256 | 137.3 | 2016.9 | 65 | – | Measured by llm-speed@llmspeed |
| r_p_f63tcgans | 2026-07-01 | chat-short | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 0 | 256 | 136.0 | – | 51 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_xnr_k4emoyr | 2026-10-17 | chat-long | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp · commit 1268eda | 3168 | 564 | 128.9 | 5987.2 | 529 | – | Measured by llm-speed@llmspeed |
| r_opuj21f13-_ | 2026-07-01 | chat-long | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 0 | 518 | 123.0 | – | 457 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_opuj21f13-_ | 2026-07-01 | agent-trace | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 3362 | 840 | 130.5 | 21985.9 | 104 | – | Community-submitted |
| r_xnr_k4emoyr | 2026-10-17 | agent-trace | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp · commit 1268eda | 3268 | 840 | 128.2 | 18881.9 | 113 | – | Measured by llm-speed@llmspeed |
| r_xnr_k4emoyr | 2026-10-17 | concurrent-decode | Q4_K_M | llama.cpp · commit 1268eda | 1024 | 256 | 136.7 | – | – | – | Measured by llm-speed@llmspeed |
| r_opuj21f13-_ | 2026-07-01 | concurrent-decode | – | llama.cpp · not reported | 1024 | 256 | 133.8 | – | – | – | Community-submitted |
Questions
Can an RTX 5090 run Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct?
Yes: an RTX 5090 runs Qwen2.5-Coder 14B at 137.3 tok/s at Q4_K_M, measured on llama.cpp with a 131-token prompt in October 2026.
How many tokens per second does Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct get on an RTX 5090?
Decode speed measured by llm-speed, by quantization and runtime: Q4_K_M on llama.cpp: 137.3 tok/s. Based on 1 run measured by llm-speed; single-request chat-short unless noted. 2 community-submitted runs are listed on the page, labelled, and not counted here.
What is the fastest quant of Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct that fits on an RTX 5090?
Q4_K_M on llama.cpp was the fastest measured setting at 137.3 tok/s; it fit because it ran. Other quants are listed only where a run measured them.
How much VRAM does Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct use on an RTX 5090?
Memory use was not recorded for these runs. The VRAM calculator gives an estimate, not a measurement.
Sources and related pages
- Source runs: r_opuj21f13-_, r_xnr_k4emoyr, r_p_f63tcgans
- Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct: every measured GPU and Mac
- RTX 5090: every measured model
- VRAM calculator for Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct on RTX 5090
- RTX 5090 vs RTX 4090
- RTX 5090 vs RTX 3090
- Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct
- How runs are measured · open dataset (CC BY 4.0)