RTX 4090 vs RTX 5090 for local LLMs: speed and VRAM
The RTX 5090 adds 8 GB of GPU memory over a standard RTX 4090. That can matter when your model and context exceed 24 GB. If your current setup already fits and responds fast enough, an upgrade needs a measured benefit on your workload.
RTX 5090 vs RTX 4090
Individual submitted decode results; model and workload shown below.
- Model
- stable-code-instruct-3b
- Reported hardware
- RTX 5090 (32GB) + AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D 8-Core Processor (8c) + 3…
- Workload / suite
- concurrent-decode · suite-v1
- Runtime
- llama.cpp · version not reported
- Quantization field
- Not reported
- Submitted
- 2026-07-01
- Model
- gemma3
- Reported hardware
- RTX 4090 (24GB) + AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core Processor (24c) + 252GB
- Workload / suite
- chat-short · suite-v1
- Runtime
- ollama · 0.31.1
- Quantization field
- Q4_K_M
- Submitted
- 2026-07-02
4090 or 5090: what changes for local LLMs?
| Specification | RTX 4090 | RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU memory | 24 GB GDDR6X | 32 GB GDDR7 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell |
| Total graphics power | 450 W | 575 W |
Sources: NVIDIA RTX 4090 and RTX 5090 specifications. Graphics power is a reference rating, not measured inference consumption or total PC draw. Check the exact board's power, connector and case requirements.
Does 32 GB let you run a model that 24 GB cannot?
Sometimes. Budget for the exact model file, context cache and runtime buffers together. A setup needing more than the available memory on a 4090 might fit fully on a 5090. A setup exceeding the available memory on both still needs a different quantization, shorter context or a measured offload configuration. A parameter count alone cannot settle this.
Our September 5 Qwen3.8-27B Q4_K_M setup on the 5090 reported 19,071 MiB of runtime GPU allocation with 16,384 tokens configured; Gemma 4 12B QAT Q4_0 reported 7,931 MiB. These allocations are not peak whole-device memory or a verified fit test on a 4090. The actual chat inputs reached roughly 3,200 tokens. Inspect the exact model files, settings and repeated measurements, then use the memory-fit estimator to shortlist your own configuration.
How much faster is the 5090 for inference?
The two share-card figures above are independently selected submissions. Different models or workloads can explain their difference; dividing those figures does not establish the benefit of upgrading your GPU. For a useful comparison, match the model artifact, quantization, runtime, prompt length, output length, cache state and concurrent request count.
Measure both first-token wait and generation speed. A document-heavy request can spend much of its time processing the prompt; fast streaming alone does not make the whole request fast. Our 5090 long-context study shows that distinction, but has no matched 4090 run. See the troubleshooting guide before attributing a slow setup to the card.
When does upgrading make sense?
- Keep a working 4090 when your chosen model, context and simultaneous requests fit, and task quality and response time meet your needs.
- Evaluate a 5090 when the extra memory solves a demonstrated fit problem, or a comparable test shows a speed improvement that matters for the work you actually do.
- Compare total upgrade cost using a current local quote, expected resale proceeds and any required PSU or case change. Record actual workload power if electricity cost affects the decision.
Save your current configuration and a representative task before changing hardware. After the change, repeat that task and check successful answers, first-token time and completion time. The measurements on this page cover inference; they do not establish training or fine-tuning speed.
Reviewed September 12, 2026. Reference hardware specifications and submitted benchmark configurations are separate evidence. For recording a comparable run, follow the benchmark setup guide.
Need the long-form table? Open the RTX 5090 vs RTX 4090 comparison for every overlapping (model × hardware) row, source runs, and methodology.